While looking at MikroTik and Cisco, both are famous systems administration arrangements. There are benefits and impediments to consider for each. Here is a breakdown:
Table of Contents
MikroTik Benefits:
Cost-Adequacy: MikroTik gadgets are generally more affordable than Cisco. This makes them accessible for independent companies. They are also suitable for home clients.
Adaptability: MikroTik offers many items suitable for different systems administration needs, from home switches to big business arrangements.
Winbox Design Instrument: The Winbox GUI is easy to understand. It considers the simple administration of gadgets. This feature can be gainful for clients who favor a graphical connection point.
Adaptability: MikroTik’s RouterOS is profoundly adjustable, permitting progressed clients to preconfigure and arrange devices to address specific issues. Solid Directing Abilities: MikroTik is known for its powerful steering capacities, including support for different protocols and progressed routing features. Learn more…
Burdens:
More extreme Expectation to absorb information. The Winbox device is easy to understand. However, the profundity of setup choices can be overpowering for fledglings.
Restricted Help: MikroTik has a more modest local area and fewer assets contrasted with Cisco. This difference can make investigating seriously testing. Less Endeavor Concentration: While competent, MikroTik might not have a similar degree of big business highlights. It may not offer the unwavering quality that bigger associations anticipate.
Cisco Benefits:
Industry Standard: Cisco is broadly perceived in the business and many organizations favor it for its standing and unwavering quality. Vigorous Help and Documentation: Cisco offers broad documentation. It provides preparing assets and client assistance, making it simpler for clients to track down help.
Complete Highlights: Cisco gadgets accompany an extensive variety of big business-level elements. These include progressed security choices, execution observing, and board instruments.
Versatility: Cisco arrangements are intended to scale effectively, making them appropriate for enormous associations and complex organization conditions. Incorporation with Other Cisco Items: Cisco gadgets frequently work consistently with other Cisco equipment. Their programming upgrades in general organization execution. Learn more…
Drawbacks:
Greater expense: Cisco items will quite often be more costly. This can be a boundary for independent ventures or individual clients.
Complex Arrangement: While Cisco offers strong elements, the setup can be perplexing and may require particular information or preparation.
Restrictive Advances: Cisco frequently utilizes exclusive advances, which can prompt sellers to secure and restrict adaptability.
Picking either MikroTik or Cisco generally relies upon your particular requirements, spending plan, and specialized ability. MikroTik offers a practical and adaptable answer for more modest organizations or clients with cutting-edge organizing abilities.
Cisco provides strong, endeavor-level highlights and backing for larger associations with more complicated systems administration prerequisites. Please drop the comments if you have some ideas or suggestions.
Key Specifications & Hardware
- Ports & Performance
- 8 × 10 Gbps SFP+ ports
- 1 × 1 GbE RJ45 management port
- Switching capacity: ~162 Gbps (non-blocking) with ~81 Gbps throughput.
- CPU & Memory
- Dual-core 800 MHz ARM 98DX8208 processor
- 512 MB RAM, 16 MB flash storage.
- Power & Cooling
- Fanless metal chassis with passive cooling—silent and reliable.
- Power consumption ranges from 17 W (idle) to 23 W (full load).
- Supports DC jack (12–57 V) or PoE-IN (802.3af/at).
- Operating Systems
- Dual-boot options: RouterOS (advanced routing, firewall, OSPF/BGP, QoS) and SwOS (lightweight L2 switching).
- Physical Specs & Management
- Compact dimensions: roughly 272×191×44 mm; rack-mountable with included ears and mounting kit.
- Includes RS-232 serial console, management port, temperature monitoring, and audible beep.
Strengths & Highlights
- Low-noise, low-power design
The fanless setup ensures silent operation and reduced power usage—ideal for home labs or quiet environments. - Impressive price-to-performance ratio
It has eight 10 Gb ports and solid throughput. The price is moderate. It offers excellent value compared to more expensive alternatives like Ubiquiti or Aruba. - Flexible management OS
You can tailor behavior based on your deployment needs. Choose between SwOS for simple switch management. Opt for RouterOS if you require advanced routing features. - Good for L2 switching
Excellent performance at layer 2, including VLANs, LACP, QoS, MAC filtering, and port mirroring.
Limitations & User Concerns
- Routing limitations
While RouterOS supports routing features, the CPU can become a bottleneck. Users report around 300–500 Mbps under typical firewall/NAT workloads without hardware offload. - Overheating with copper modules
Copper SFP+ (10G RJ45) modules generate high heat. If crowded, the device may overheat or shut down. Thermal mods or spacing are often advised. - Setup complexity & VLAN UX
Some users find the interface or routing setup non-intuitive, though powerful. VLAN setup especially can require a steeper learning curve. - Long-term reliability
A few consumer reports note hardware failures (e.g., ports becoming non-responsive) after extended use.
Real-World User Insights
“It works great as a switch … silent, never needed to reboot… just boot to SwOS.”
“Overheating issues if more than three copper SFP+ modules are used—works fine in a cool rack.”
“In RouterOS with hardware offload, got up to 9.4 Gbps in NAT tests—a solid result.”
Final Verdict
Great choice as a silent, efficient L2 10 Gb switch with excellent value and flexibility via dual OS. Best for setups that emphasize switching performance and passive cooling.
Not ideal as a primary router unless you’re leveraging RouterOS 7.x hardware offload optimally. For heavy routing/NAT/firewall, pairing with a dedicated router (e.g., RB series) is wise. Caution with copper SFP+ modules: Use fewer or space them out, or opt for fiber/DAC to avoid overheating.
Discover more from How To Kh
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
3 Comments
flvjho
yk3nye
zcprmd