Based on the news from the U.S., Israel dispatches many airstrikes on Syria. This development has raised concerns internationally as Israel dispatches many airstrikes on Syria. The most recent airstrikes follow an assertion by Israel’s security service, Israel Katz. He stated that Israeli soldiers held onto the Golan Heights’ buffer zone with Syria last week. These soldiers would stay for the colder time of year. They would remain on Mount Hermon in places they had been involved in the week before.
Israel struck many destinations in Syria short term with airstrikes. Although the Syrian radical pioneer, Abu Mohammed al-Jolani, stated that his Hayat Tahrir al-Joke (HTS) group was not keen on a struggle with Israel, Israel dispatches airstrikes regardless. Katz’s office issued a proclamation. It stated that the situation in Syria has significant security importance. Thus, we must maintain control over the pinnacle.
Ahmed al-Sharaa uses the nom de guerre Abu Mohammed al-Jolani. He told Syrian state media that there are no real reasons for unfamiliar mediation in Syria now. This is because the Iranians have left. We are not in that frame of mind of taking part in a contention with Israel.” Jolani said Israel was utilizing bogus affections to legitimize its assaults on Syria. However, he was not interested in participating in new struggles. The country focused on reconstruction after the end of Bashar al-Assad’s rule.
He added that “strategic arrangements” were the best way to guarantee steadiness. This is instead of “not well thought out to be military experiences”. Israeli contentions have become frail and no longer legitimize their new infringement. The Israelis have plainly crossed the lines of commitment in Syria. This represents a danger of ridiculous heightening in the district,” Jolani said.
Syria’s conflict exhausted condition following quite a while of contention and war, doesn’t take into consideration new showdowns. The need at this stage is reproduction and steadiness, not being brought into question, which could prompt further annihilation.” The English-based Syrian Observatory for Common Freedoms reported that Israel launched 61 rockets at Syrian military locations. This occurred in under five hours on Saturday night. In its many airstrikes, Israel hit bases, heavy weapons, and sites related to Assad’s former missile program. They also obliterated Syria’s little maritime power in the port of Latakia.
Table of Contents
Why Israel Is Striking Syria
- Preventing Iranian Influence & Weapon Transfers
Israel sees Iranian-backed militias (such as Hezbollah, IRGC-affiliated units, or other proxy groups) operating in Syria as a direct security threat. By striking weapons depots, missile storage sites, airbases, drone facilities, and command infrastructure, Israel aims to hinder Iran’s ability to supply advanced weapons or enable proxies to strike Israeli territory. - Disrupting Militancy and Extremist Group Capabilities
Some of the targets are tied to groups Israel considers extremist or hostile, including Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), or other Islamist factions. By performing airstrikes on Syria, Israel argues that neutralizing their logistical and weapons capabilities reduces the likelihood of cross-border attacks. This action also helps to prevent destabilizing spillovers. - Maintaining Strategic Deterrence
Frequent strikes serve as a signal of Israeli readiness and willingness to act. To deter Syria or its allies, Israel dispatches airstrikes to prevent hostile forces from building infrastructure near the Israeli border or the Golan Heights. This helps maintain Israel’s strategic buffer zone. - Responding to Specific Threats
At times, strikes respond to rocket launches from Syrian territory. They also respond to attempted attacks or intelligence of imminent threats. By striking early (pre-emptively), Israel aims to reduce risk to its population or infrastructure. - Exploiting Power Vacuums & Syrian Instability
The Syrian civil war has caused instability. The collapse or weakening of Assad-era structures has also contributed. This situation has created gaps in oversight and enforcement. Israel seems to exploit that instability by dispatching many airstrikes and aiming to hit military or paramilitary infrastructure. These targets might otherwise be more difficult to degrade. - Pre-empting Long-Range Capabilities
Some targets include long-range missiles, naval missile launchers, or air defence systems. These could threaten not just Israel’s immediate border. They could also threaten strategic Israeli air or sea routes. By removing or degrading those assets, Israel preserves freedom of movement for its own forces and reduces strategic threats.
Considerations & Risks
- Sovereignty and Escalation: These strikes are controversial under international law, seen by Syria and many observers as violations of sovereignty. They carry a risk of escalation. Syria or its allies, like Iran or Russia, may respond. The risk is heightened when the strikes damage civilian infrastructure or cause casualties.
- Collateral Damage: Some strikes have reportedly resulted in civilian casualties. They have also caused damage to non-military infrastructure. This fuels regional tensions and international criticism.
- Unclear Transparency: Israel often does not publicly detail all its targets or intelligence. As a result, analysts infer much of the justification. This opacity can raise questions about proportionality or necessity under international norms.
Bottom Line
Israel’s repeated airstrikes on Syria stem from a strategic objective of reducing Iranian-backed military threats, preventing transfers of advanced weaponry, and maintaining a buffer against potential cross-border aggression. While the operations are framed as self-defense and preemption, they also pose diplomatic risks, regional instability, and concerns over civilian harm. The effectiveness of this strategy largely depends on Israel’s ability to degrade hostile capabilities while avoiding uncontrollable escalation as Israel dispatches many airstrikes on Syria.
